Independent record. Not associated with, endorsed by or operated by Binance. This site is read-only: there is nothing to sign in to, pay for or connect.

All statements

Halborn's table put the loss on Tron at 612.7 million USDT and 46.4 million TRX, about 628 million dollars, through plain signed transfers from a hot wallet.

This line is our short summary of the quote below. The quote is the evidence.

ReportedamountStatement 983

| Tron | 612.7 million USDT and 46.4 million TRX, about 628 million dollars | Plain signed transfers from a hot wallet | 20:22 |

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Halborn (Analytics firm)
Original
Explained: Hacks Inside the Largest Crypto Theft on Record: What the $6.3 Billion Binance Hack Means for Bank Custody 10.30.2026
Captured
Stored copy
sha256 970c3b9ba88b
Event time

Other statements from the same source

ReportedwithdrawalsStatement 1002

Halborn said Binance's own pipeline pushed 200 million USDT into a compromised wallet eighty minutes after the drain.

Binance’s own pipeline pushed 200 million USDT into a compromised wallet eighty minutes after the drain.

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Halborn (Analytics firm)
Original
Explained: Hacks Inside the Largest Crypto Theft on Record: What the $6.3 Billion Binance Hack Means for Bank Custody 10.30.2026
Captured
Stored copy
sha256 970c3b9ba88b
ReportedamountStatement 1001

Halborn said Binance lost about four percent of what it held, which it said sounds like a conservative hot allocation until four percent is six billion.

Binance lost about four percent of what it held, which sounds like a conservative hot allocation until four percent is six billion.

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Halborn (Analytics firm)
Original
Explained: Hacks Inside the Largest Crypto Theft on Record: What the $6.3 Billion Binance Hack Means for Bank Custody 10.30.2026
Captured
Stored copy
sha256 970c3b9ba88b
Reportedroot causeStatement 994

Halborn said that in both the Bybit and Binance incidents the legitimate signing system produced a valid signature for the attacker's transaction, and that in neither was a key broken, extracted or, as far as anyone can show, copied.

In both, the legitimate signing system produced a valid signature for the attacker's transaction, and in neither was a key broken, extracted or, as far as anyone can show, copied.

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Halborn (Analytics firm)
Original
Explained: Hacks Inside the Largest Crypto Theft on Record: What the $6.3 Billion Binance Hack Means for Bank Custody 10.30.2026
Captured
Stored copy
sha256 970c3b9ba88b
ReportedamountStatement 973

Halborn said that on October 29, 2026, between 20:05 and 23:56 UTC, an attacker moved about 6.3 billion dollars out of Binance's hot wallets on ten blockchains, and that nobody had yet shown that a private key was stolen.

On October 29, 2026, between 20:05 and 23:56 UTC, an attacker moved about 6.3 billion dollars out of Binance's hot wallets on ten blockchains, and nobody has yet shown that a private key was stolen.

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Halborn (Analytics firm)
Original
Explained: Hacks Inside the Largest Crypto Theft on Record: What the $6.3 Billion Binance Hack Means for Bank Custody 10.30.2026
Captured
Stored copy
sha256 970c3b9ba88b
ReportedattributionStatement 779

Halborn said Sygnia traced the Bybit loss to a compromised developer workstation, stolen cloud session tokens and a tampered signing interface, called it the same playbook with a different entry, and added that precedent is not evidence.

In Bybit, Sygnia traced the loss to a compromised developer workstation at the wallet provider, stolen cloud session tokens and a tampered signing interface. Same playbook, different entry. Precedent is not evidence, but it is a very good search warrant.

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Halborn (Analytics firm)
Original
Explained: Hacks Inside the Largest Crypto Theft on Record: What the $6.3 Billion Binance Hack Means for Bank Custody 10.30.2026
Captured
Stored copy
sha256 970c3b9ba88b