Independent record. Not associated with, endorsed by or operated by Binance. This site is read-only: there is nothing to sign in to, pay for or connect.

All sources

Hacker News comment

Publisher
Hacker News (Social media)
Original
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50297456
Published
not stated
First seen
Last captured
Watched for edits
No

Capture history

Newest first. The raw hash is the SHA-256 of the stored copy exactly as fetched. We keep the copy privately and publish its hash. The text hash is of the text extracted from it, which is what is compared between captures.

Captured (UTC)Fetched viaHTTPRaw sha256Text sha256Text changed
http200a9be05a5ddbec31ec6abcbf5e2d77bdaae84124fae5c48787d7d7e88a3b9283bb1d0789bdd1ee7bf8fb545524817e51b2f8b2e98b7cdccca991060faaeecd80cNo

Changes between captures

No text changes detected between captures of this source.

Claims quoted from this source

Theoryroot causeStatement 473

A Hacker News commenter wrote that a risk management system should not let $5bn be transferred instantly, and wondered whether it was an inside job.

You split it into thousands and then use hardware security modules with a risk management system so it doesn't let you transfer $5bn instantly. Unless it was an inside job maybe? I'd be really curious to know what their security architecture was.

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Hacker News (Social media)
Original
Hacker News comment
Captured
Stored copy
sha256 a9be05a5ddbe
Event time