Jonathan Riss said the $6.3 billion figure represented the cumulative value of assets affected across 10 blockchains.
Riss said the $6.3 billion figure represented the cumulative value of assets affected across 10 blockchains.
Independent record. Not associated with, endorsed by or operated by Binance. This site is read-only: there is nothing to sign in to, pay for or connect.
An independent record of the October 2026 Binance hack
Newest first. The raw hash is the SHA-256 of the stored copy exactly as fetched. We keep the copy privately and publish its hash. The text hash is of the text extracted from it, which is what is compared between captures.
| Captured (UTC) | Fetched via | HTTP | Raw sha256 | Text sha256 | Text changed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| firecrawl-web08 | 200 | 188a7d4c7b0fa8bb3fa781005db366d1c0036dd5dc60fea37aa419025382cadf | 4bc9eb637bfc9b2aee37fc4489f30e98585a7f9d835d42558eb7dfa41185bd23 | No |
No text changes detected between captures of this source.
Riss said the $6.3 billion figure represented the cumulative value of assets affected across 10 blockchains.
Idan Ofrat, co-founder and chief product officer at Fireblocks, said exchanges typically keep enough funds in hot wallets to cover a few days of expected withdrawals, often representing a low single-digit percentage of assets under management.
Alex Tobol, chief technology officer at Telegram-based crypto wallet Walt, said holding billions of dollars in hot wallets is not inherently unusual for an exchange of Binance’s size.
Transaction limits enforced by the application requesting a signature can be bypassed if that application is compromised, Riss said. Limits enforced independently by the signing system may still restrict transfers.